RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-03842
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code be changed to allow him
reentry into the Air National Guard (ANG).
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He took an early out because he had back problems that were
giving him issues in physical fitness. He took advantage of an
early out so he would not be kicked out of the military. His
back issue is now corrected and he would like to join the ANG.
He doesnt know why his RE code is not allowing him to reenter
the military.
The applicants complete submission, with attachments, is at
Exhibit A.
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant initially entered the Regular Air Force on
28 Aug 07.
According to the applicants AF Form 418, Selective Reenlistment
Program (SRP) Consideration for Airmen in the Regular Air
Force/Air Force Reserve, dated 17 Nov 11, he was non-recommended
for re-enlistment by his supervisor as a result of a quality
force review conducted IAW the FY12 Enlisted DOS Rollback PDSM
11-94. The commander concurred with this recommendation on 17
Nov 11.
The applicant did not appeal the commanders decision.
On 31 Mar 12, the applicant was discharged honorably, and was
credited with four years, seven months, and three days of active
service and was issued an RE code of 2X (1st term, 2nd term or
career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment).
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are
contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of
primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C.
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of
an error or an injustice. AFI 36-2606, Reenlistment in the
USAF, states commanders have selective reenlistment selection or
non-selection authority. The Selective Reenlistment Program
(SRP) considers the members Enlisted Performance Report (EPR)
ratings, Unfavorable Information from any substantiated source,
the airman's willingness to comply with Air Force standards
and/or the airman's ability (or lack of) to meet required
training and duty performance levels. The applicant chose not
to appeal his non-selection for reenlistment and the RE code 2X
is correct based his non-selection. The applicant contends he
had back problems which caused him issues with passing his
physical fitness and took an "early out" instead of being
kicked out. However, the Rollback is not a voluntary program
but forces members who are selected based on negative quality
indicators to separate by a predetermined date. In the
applicant's case he had to separate by 31 Mar 12 and could not
have stayed in the Air Force if he wanted to. Additionally,
members that fail physical fitness for a recognized medical
issue verified by the Medical Group are not kicked out.
Members on a physical profile are excused from being tested if
the competent medical authority believes the medical condition
warrants a profile.
A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit C.
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the
applicant on 23 Feb 15 for review and comment within 30 days
(Exhibit D). As of this date, no response has been received by
this office.
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by
existing law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. We took
notice of the applicants complete submission in judging the
merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and
recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility
(OPR) and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion
the applicant has not been the victim of an error of injustice.
Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find
no basis to recommend granting the requested relief.
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this
application.
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2014-03842 in Executive Session on 14 May 15, under
the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
The following documentary evidence pertaining AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2014-03842 was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 12 Sep 14, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Memorandum, AFPC/DPSOA, dated 20 Oct 14.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 23 Feb 15.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05487
Block 8b, Station Where Separated, of his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be corrected to reflect Andrews Air Force Base, Maryland, instead of Randolph Air Force Base, Texas. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 1. The applicants commander indicated the applicant identified himself as eligible for separation under the DOS Rollback program and it was his intention to deny the applicant reenlistment...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01220
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-01220 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code of 2X (1st term, 2nd term or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the selective reenlistment program (SRP)) and separation program designator (SPD) code of JBK (expiration of term of service) be changed...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01281
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01281 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Separation Program Designator (SPD) code LGH (Non- retention on active duty) is inaccurate and unjust. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandums prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility (OPR), which are attached at Exhibits C and D. AIR...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02503
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02503 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The reentry (RE) code of 2X (1st term, 2nd term or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment) on her DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be changed to allow her to reenter the military. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02198
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02198 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His separation code of JGH (non-retention on active duty) and his Reentry (RE) code of 2X (First-term, second-term, or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP))be changed so that he can enlist in the Air National Guard (ANG). The complete DPSOA...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02165
On 16 Jun 10, the applicants supervisor non-recommended him for reenlistment and, on the same day, the applicants commander non-selected him for reenlistment. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility, which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial, indicating the applicant has...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03632
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-03632 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code of 2X (1st term, 2nd term or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment) be changed to reflect the correct RE code. Although there is not an Air Force IMT 418, Selective Reenlistment Program Consideration, in the applicants record denying him reenlistment, there is a...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02189
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02189 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code be changed. The raters comments state Member elected not to provide comments to the referral memo dated 24 Nov 2010. On 18 Feb 11, the applicants squadron commander did not select her for reenlistment stating she had received an Article 15 for drawing a sexual innuendo...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05961
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05961 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reentry (RE) code of 2X (Career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the Selective Reenlistment Program), as reflected on his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be changed to allow him to...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 05961
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05961 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reentry (RE) code of 2X (Career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the Selective Reenlistment Program), as reflected on his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be changed to allow him to...